Informe o publicación no disponible en formato digital.
Para más antecedentes contactarse al fono 56-2-22008978, mail cedoc@ciren.cl o visitando nuestra Biblioteca en Manuel Montt 1164, Providencia Santiago Chile”
Para más antecedentes contactarse al fono 56-2-22008978, mail cedoc@ciren.cl o visitando nuestra Biblioteca en Manuel Montt 1164, Providencia Santiago Chile”
Report 2022 : Pesticide residues in food : Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues
Loading...
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
FAO; WHO
Materia(s):
Palabra(s) clave(s):
Fecha:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Resumen:
A Joint Meeting of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Panel of Experts on
Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the World Health Organization (WHO) Core
Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) was held at FAO Head-quarters, Rome (Italy), from 13
to 22 September 2022. FAO Panel Members met in preparatory sessions from 8 to 12 September.
The Meeting was opened by Dr Jingyuan Xia, Director, Plant Production and Protection Division
(NSP), FAO. On behalf of FAO and WHO, Dr Xia welcomed and thanked the participants for providing their
expertise and for devoting significant time and effort to the work of the JMPR, noting that this was the
first physical JMPR meeting since 2019 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, with 45 participants
from 15 countries.
Dr Xia highlighted food safety is fundamental to healthy and sustainable food systems. The
establishment of pesticide residue standards is a key and critical element in the global effort to improve
food safety and agricultural development in the world. The unique role of the JMPRs work in establishing
internationally acceptable MRLs for pesticide residues in food and feed which acted as global
benchmarks in trade facilitation, as well as providing authoritative assessments, important in consumer
protection. Dr Xia then outlined how the JMPRs efforts aligned with the Divisions strategic objectives of
ensuring food security and nutrition; enhancing food quality and safety; supporting farmers’ livelihoods;
protecting the environment and biodiversity; and facilitating safe trade and economic growth. As the
establishment of global standards were a key and critical element in the global efforts to improve food
safety and agricultural development in the world.
Dr Xia also took the opportunity to express his and called on the meeting participants toexpress
their appreciation to Madam YongZhen Yang, retiring FAO JMPR Secretariat, for her dedicated
commitment and outstanding contribution in fulfilling the secretariat role over the past 16 years.
Dr Soren Madsen, WHO JMPR Secretariat, took the opportunity to thank the FAO for giving
priority to JMPR to allow the meeting to occur at FAO headquarters.
During the meeting, the FAO Panel of Experts was responsible for reviewing residue and
analytical aspects of the pesticides under consideration, including data on their metabolism, fate in the
environment and use patterns, and for estimating the maximum levels of residues that might occur as a
result of use of the pesticides according to good agricultural practice (GAP). Maximum residue levels and
supervised trials median residue (STMR) values were estimated for commodities of animal origin. The
WHO Core Assessment Group was responsible for reviewing toxicological and related data in order to
establish acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and acute reference doses (ARfDs), where necessary.
The Meeting evaluated 34 pesticides, including seven new compounds and four compounds that
were re-evaluated within the periodic review programme of the CCPR, for toxicity or residues, or both.
The Meeting established ADIs and ARfDs, estimated maximum residue levels and recommended
them for use by CCPR, and estimated STMR and highest residue (HR) levels as a basis for estimating
dietary intake.
The Meeting also estimated the dietary exposures (both short-term and long-term) of the
pesticides reviewed and, on this basis, performed a dietary risk assessment in relation to the relevant ADI
and where necessary ARfD. Cases in which ADIs or ARfDs may be exceeded were clearly indicated in order
to facilitate the decision-making process by CCPR.
Fuente del recurso:
https://doi.org/10.4060/cc4115en
Colección:
Catálogo Biblioteca CIREN